DesignHere

connecting Vancouver's design community

UX research & design 6 weeks · with Yuki Shi Figma, Google Forms, FigJam Emily Carr University · Apr 2026
01 — the spark

The Problem

Vancouver has a real design community — it shows up at studio crits, small meetups, and the back rooms of East Van cafés. But there's no single place to find any of it. Events live on Eventbrite, Luma, Instagram stories, Discord servers, and whatever your professor forwarded last week. You find out about half of them the day after they happen.

And when you do show up, the connection usually ends in the parking lot. No tool for follow-up, no shared thread, no way to remember who was interesting. Most people fall back to LinkedIn — which is global, performative, and built for getting hired, not for being present in the city you already live in.

Having to look in 10 different places to find one small thing. There's no one cohesive platform.

Problem statement: New designers have difficulty connecting with the design community because there is no way to search or find the community in Vancouver.

How might we…

…help new designers find a meaningful network with others in the industry.

02 — research

Mapping the Pattern

Yuki and I ran a mixed-methods study across six weeks — survey, interviews, competitive analysis, and proto personas — targeting designers at different career stages, all based in Vancouver. I led UX flow design, lo-fi prototyping, and data collection; Yuki led competitor research, survey design, and data analysis. We stayed tight on scope so fourteen responses could still tell us something real.

14 responses to the survey, spanning students to senior designers
2 interviews for depth on discovery, follow-up, and trust
6 competitors analysed — LinkedIn, Eventbrite, Luma, Meetup, Dribbble, Discord
3 proto personas covering designer, organizer, and moderator
Research overview: 14 survey responses, 2 interviews, 6 competitors analysed, 3 proto personas. Tools: Figma, Google Forms, FigJam.
fig 01 — methods & research

Three user types

Early in the process we realized DesignHere wouldn't work if we only designed for one side of the room. The platform needed three audiences to hold together — the designer looking for a community, the organizer trying to reach them, and the moderator keeping the signal high.

01Designerdiscovering events, making connections, following up after
02Organizerposting events, reaching the right audience, managing RSVPs
03Moderatorreviewing submissions, keeping the platform trustworthy

Proto personas

One proto persona per user type — each shaped around a distinct job to be done, same underlying gap in the ecosystem.

Persona 01 · featured
The Designer
stageearly-career or newly relocated looking forlocal community, events, meaningful connections
"Your classmates are your first network."
relationship-first platform-fatigued event-curious Vancouver-rooted
Persona 02
The Organizer
"I'm posting everywhere, but I'm not sure if new designers will actually see this." — plans and promotes local meetups; struggles to reach people outside existing networks. Pain: RSVPs rarely match real attendance; no central hub for post-event engagement.
Persona 03
The Moderator
Reviews submissions to keep content quality high without becoming a gatekeeper. Needs: structured forms, rule-based scoring, and fast card-based triage — so the platform can scale without scaling the moderation team.

Survey findings

Two charts did most of the work. The first mapped current discovery behaviour and the challenges people named unprompted. The second mapped what they'd actually want from a platform that understood them.

Survey findings: 9/14 say maintaining relationships is harder than finding them, 10/14 say LinkedIn feels wrong, 8/14 check 3+ platforms to find one event, 7/14 want Vancouver-specific curation.
fig 02 — where it breaks
Feature priorities: 71% want connection tracking tools, 50% want local event curation, majority prefer transparent moderation over verified profiles, only 21% cited verified profiles as a trust driver.
fig 03 — what they asked for

The headline: 9 of 14 (64%) said maintaining relationships is harder than finding them. 71% said a tool that helped them track connections would be the most valuable feature. And 50% said transparent moderation mattered more than verified profiles — people don't want gatekeepers, they want accountability.

The problem isn't connection. It's continuity.

Affinity themes

Yuki and I pulled every survey quote, interview fragment, and competitive observation onto a shared FigJam board and clustered until the patterns held. Four themes emerged — each pointing at a distinct pain, each eventually becoming an insight.

Fragmented Discovery8/14 check 3+ platforms
Relationship Continuity9/14 — biggest challenge
Platform Mismatch10/14 — LinkedIn feels wrong
Trust & Local Curation7/14 want Vancouver-specific
Affinity map with four themes — Fragmented Discovery, Relationship Continuity, Platform Mismatch, Trust & Local Curation — and three synthesized insights.
fig 04 — affinity map

Three key insights

01. Centralized Event Discovery. Users struggle with discovering events because information is fragmented, leading to missed opportunities.

02. Clear Event Context & Evaluation. Users struggle with evaluating events because of limited context, leading to hesitation.

03. Support Post-Event Engagement. Users struggle with maintaining connections because of lack of follow-up support, leading to shallow engagement.

Competitive positioning

I mapped the landscape on two axes: global vs. local, and professional/formal vs. community/casual. The top half was full — LinkedIn, Dribbble, Behance, Eventbrite. The bottom-right corner — local and community-feeling — was almost empty. That's where DesignHere would sit.

PROFESSIONALCOMMUNITY GLOBALLOCAL LinkedIn Dribbble Behance Eventbrite Luma Meetup Discord DesignHere
03 — design process

From Insight to Direction

01
Survey design
Drafted and piloted a 12-question survey covering discovery, freelance & community, building relationships, challenges & barriers, and looking forward. Ran it for two weeks through school channels and local design Discords.
02
Semi-structured interviews
Two 45-minute interviews — one with a creative director (Adrian Ho), one with a freelance illustrator (Dodo). Open questions first, then probing into specific moments — last event attended, last person followed up with, last tool abandoned.
03
Competitive audit
Yuki reviewed six platforms against a shared rubric — discovery, follow-up, trust, moderation, tone, and local relevance. Each mapped on a 2×2 to find the empty corner.
04
Proto personas & journey maps
Built three proto personas covering distinct career stages, and journey-mapped both the Designer and Organizer experiences to surface where the current ecosystem fails each.
05
Affinity mapping
Clustered observations in FigJam until four themes held. Three insights carried forward to inform feature priority.
06
Reverse thinking & wireframes
Flipped the prompt to surface barriers, then inverted each into a concept direction. Prioritized with an impact/effort matrix and built mid-fi wireframes for all three user types.

The key move: reverse thinking

Before brainstorming solutions, we flipped the prompt. Instead of "how do we help Vancouver designers connect?" we asked "how would we make it impossible?" — and listed every barrier we could think of.

Reverse thinking: six barriers to connection inverted into three concept directions — centralized discovery feed, connection tracker, safe studio.
fig 04 — reverse thinking

Six barriers surfaced. Grouped, they pointed at three distinct concept directions — not a single product, but three shapes the product could take.

CONCEPT 01
Centralized Discovery Feed
Fragmented discovery → one place to find everything happening in Vancouver's design community.
addresses barriers 1 + 2
CONCEPT 02
Connection Tracker
No follow-up tools → a lightweight CRM for design connections, with reminders and shared context.
addresses barrier 3
CONCEPT 03
Safe Studio
Intimidating, high-stakes spaces → a low-stakes local community where WIPs are welcome and the pressure is off.
addresses barriers 4 + 5 + 6
04 — the solution

A Home for Design, Here

DesignHere is a responsive web app (PWA) that serves as a focused discovery tool for Vancouver's design scene — centralized discovery, connection tracking, and a low-stakes community space, built for three audiences at once.

Three user flows, one platform

01Designer Userdiscover events, save attendees, follow up, share WIPs
02Event Organizerpost events, reach designers by stage and discipline, manage RSVPs
03Moderatorreview submissions via one-tap card triage, keep content quality high

Key design decisions

Structured submission form. Keeps event listings consistent and dramatically reduces the moderation burden before content is ever reviewed.

Tiered trust system. New organizers get reviewed initially, then earn auto-publish privileges over time. Accountability without gatekeeping.

Automated moderation. Rule-based scoring handles the easy calls and scales the platform without scaling the moderation team.

One-tap card-based triage. When human moderation is needed, the work is fast — swipe-style cards, clear decisions, no long forms.

Auto-generated shareable event cards. Every listing produces a social-ready graphic, creating a flywheel where organic shares become the platform's organic growth.

What to build first

We sorted every idea onto an impact/effort matrix so the first build could be small but meaningful — and so the roadmap past it was legible to anyone reading this later.

Prioritization matrix: start here — central event feed, post-event attendee list, beginner filters; phase two — connection tracker, community space, organizer tools; future — verified profiles, job board.
fig 05 — where to start
start here
Central event feed for Vancouver design events
Post-event attendee list with save and note
Beginner-friendly filters for approachable events
phase two
Connection tracker with follow-up reminders
Moderated, low-stakes community space
Organizer tools for targeted reach
future
Verified profile system — only 21% cited it as a trust driver
Job board — valuable but secondary to core community need

Next steps

Five validation steps: validate proto personas with 5–8 interviews, build lo-fi prototypes, run preference testing, partner with organizers, expand survey to 50+ respondents.
fig 06 — five steps to validate
05 — outcomes

What the Research Showed

The sharpest finding of the project wasn't about features — it was a reframe. Vancouver's design community faces a continuity problem more than a discovery problem. Finding events is fragmented, yes — but the deeper pain is what happens after. Designers have no tools to maintain the connections they make, and that's where the community breaks down.

todaywith DesignHere
3–5 platforms checked for each eventone local feed, filtered by stage and format
71% use LinkedIn — but it feels performativelow-stakes, local, drafts welcome
9/14 lose connections after eventsattendee lists with save + note, built in
Trust defaults to verified profilestrust defaults to transparent moderation
Organizers follow up one by onetools for targeted reach by stage and discipline

DesignHere is positioned in a space no competitor currently occupies — a Vancouver-specific, relationship-first design community platform. The strongest opportunity combines all three: local event discovery, relationship maintenance tools, and a safe community space for all levels.

71% want relationship tracking. 64% say it's their #1 challenge. The platform that solves continuity wins.
06 — reflection

What Worked, What We'd Change

Pairing competitive analysis with the survey gave us both landscape context and direct user input — neither alone would have surfaced the continuity insight. The proto personas also did real work: they kept the survey specific enough to say something real when the data came back.

What I'd change: expand the sample beyond 14, validate personas against real users mid-project rather than after, and run the affinity mapping session together rather than splitting the clustering work. Pattern recognition improves when the observations overlap in real time.

What this taught me

Designers talk about community a lot, but community is mostly context — the small, specific things about a place that make showing up feel worth it. The hardest part of this brief wasn't inventing features. It was listening closely enough to hear the reframe that was sitting in the data all along: the problem isn't connection, it's continuity.